Thursday, October 9, 2008

Barack Obama wins popular vote. McCain wins electoral college and Presidency

I am 100% sure that Barack Obama will win the popular vote but John McCain will win the electoral college and the Presidency. Everyone is playing up the poll numbers and Barack Obama's lead in those polls as if they are devastating news to John McCain. They are not. Polls are very inaccurate. One can see how inaccurate polls are just by looking at how none of them agree. In addition to the inherent inaccuracies in polls there is the way that the issue of race skews the accuracy of polls even further.

The first issue of race effecting polls is the Bradley effect and the reverse Bradley effect. The Bradley effect, as it is called, is a way to describe how when an African-American is running against a white opponent, the poll numbers sometimes do not match the actual vote totals. Basically it is hypothesized that white voters say they will vote for the African-American candidate or that they are undecided and then vote for the white candidate which was their intention all along. Some say this might be because white voters fell uneasy answering the question of who they will vote for because it might be seen as a racial decision. To avoid the appearance of racism these voters say they will vote for the African-American candidate or say they are undecided, when they have already made up their mind to vote for the white candidate, just to avoid the question. The reverse Bradley effect is used to explain why some African-American candidates poll lower and then get more votes in the final election. This hypothesis is based on the idea that pollsters are not polling enough African-Americans or young voters.

RealClearPolitics Poll Averages

General Election: McCain vs. Obama


2 comments:

michaelwilson said...

I agree that most of the polls are inaccurate - mostly because they have chosen a winner before the polls are made.
The interesting aspect is if various polls could be combined would we then get a more "accurate" result.

The poll result on Electoral-vote.com has inputs from various pollsters.
A widget has been built to add interactivity to the numbers.

Check it out:
http://www.youcalc.com/apps/1221747067033

... and its easy to put on your blog and fits in your sidebar!

Make a difference, keep on voting!

Mark Prime (tpm/Confession Zero) said...

Close... it was not.

I will have to disagree with your assessment that voting for Obama because he is black is reverse racism. The term racism is about bigotry, discrimination, prejudice. Reverse racism is racism that stems from perhaps an unfounded fear or intimidation or is the actual racism stemming from previous or perceived racism. You lump it in with something that is certainly not racism, ie- whites voting for Obama because he is black because they themselves (the white person) has some form of guilt or as you put it, "if Obama was elected, that it might heal some of the racial wounds our country suffers from. This is a noble idea but it is still racism to pick a candidate solely on the color of their skin."

It is not racism to positively vote for a black person based on the color of his skin. It may be an odd way of deciding how one is to vote, but racism it is not.

You say the first issue of race effecting polls is the Bradley effect (and the reverse Bradey). The thing that brought about the term "The Bradley Effect" certainly stems from a form of racism if not racism itself, but the "Reverse Bradley" (if there is such a thing) would not be racism. They can name it anything they want, but, when a white person doesn't vote for a candidate because he is black, it is, without a doubt, racism. If someone tells a pollster that they are voting for the other candidate (unless they specifically say it is because they are white) does not necessarily mean that they are racist.

You are confusing two very different (emotions, ideas) things.

Either way, President Elect Barack Obama would probably disagree along with the millions, like myself, who voted for him because of what he stood for and for what we thought he could bring to this country. I would say that that is why he won by very impressive numbers and why "The Bradley Effect" had no say in the massive win.